Overall Policy and Philosophy
on Water Resources

Brazil's overall policy and philosophy on water resources is defined
throughout its 1997 National Policy on Water Resources.
The NPWR's principles are as follows:
- Water is a common good of public domain;
- Water is a scarce natural resource endowed with economic value;
- In situations of critical scarcity priority will be given to human
supply and animal consumption;
- Water management must always make provision for the multiple uses
of water;
- The river basin is the basic territorial unit for the planning
and implementation of the NPWR as well as for the Water National
Management System;
- Water management must be decentralized. Decision making is required
to be a participative process that includes government representatives
as well as legitimate private sector and community representatives.
The NPWR aims at ensuring actual and future generations with water
supply that meets both the quality and quantity required for the
different uses. It aims at promoting a rational and integrated use
of the water resources, including water transportation, so as to
ensure sustainable development. Lastly, it aims at prevention and
defense from water related critical events, both natural and the
ones originated from inadequate human interventions.
Brazil's NPWR promotes a systematic water management system which
integrates quality and quantity aspects as inseparable aspects of
the water resources. It takes into account the country's regional
diversity in relation to its physical, demographic, biotic, economic,
social and cultural specificities. As far as coordination is concerned,
it promotes the integration of water management with the country's
overall environmental management system; it makes provision for
the integration of the water management system at the regional,
state and national planning levels as well as with the private sector;
it promotes coordination with land use planning as well as the integration
of basin management with river and coastal systems. Finally, it
establishes a decentralized integrated management system at the
river basin level, based in partnerships between legitimate representatives
of all stakeholders: government, private sector and civil society.
Highlights
During its first years of existence the Agency's actions focused
in addressing two major problems: i) the prolonged droughts,
which affect very especially the North-East Region; and ii) river
pollution.
Prolonged Droughts: Water Market Demand Management
ANA's decisions are based on the assumption that dealing with permanent
or cyclic drought situations could not be addressed through increasing
water offer only. Drought situations should be addressed mainly
through demand management, which includes prevention and saving
water measures such as the establishment of use quotas and the payment
of compensation to affected users.
Water Market Creation in the Jaguaribe River
ANA's first experience in the creation of water market took place
in the semi-arid North East Region. By early 2001 the National Water
Agency realized that the amount of water stored in the Jaguaribe
river basin (*) would only be enough to attend approximately half
the agricultural annual demand. In order to address this issue the
farmers were required to pay R$ 0,01 for every 1,000 liters of water
used by them. The funds raised through the water charges were used
to compensate for the farmers that were left without enough water
to irrigate their crops, provided that they would shift water intensive
crops, such as rice, for less water intensive ones with higher value
added. The farmers that joined the program could also access credits
for buying new agricultural equipments as well as training programs.
The development objective behind water charges was in fact to prepare
this semi-arid region so that it would focus on higher value added
agricultural crops that are less water intensive. Experiences such
as the Jaguaribe's river case places Brazil in a world leading position
as far as water resources is concerned. Countries such as France,
The Netherlands and Germany had their farmers paying for the water
use very recently only.
(*) Located in the state of Ceara, semi-arid region.
River Basin Pollution Abatement:
the PRODES Experience
During march 2001, and after being in place for only three months,
the Agency launched its most innovative program, PRODES, which consists
in providing economic incentives for the construction of new sewerage
treatment plants, aiming at the environmental recovery of the country's
most polluted river basins. The Program avoids the most common,
historical error, which is financing inefficient public works that
would not respond to the expected pollution abatement results. The
PRODES program pays for results: it pays for treated sewerage. Payments
are made available only after the achievement of the agreed goals
on water quality indexes are demonstrated. Implementation of this
program requires that the River Basin Committee is established and
operative. It requires also that a social agreement is carried out
between legitimate representatives of all stakeholders: the Federal
Government through ANA; the State Governments; the Private Sector
and Civil Society legitimate representatives.
The Agency, in partnership with the River Basin Committees, has
already started to apply two key mechanisms aiming at improving
the efficiency in river's use: i) the licensing for use and/or effluent
disposal and, ii) the application of charges on effluent discharges
for those polluting the rivers.
It is ANA's attribution to enforce the laws on water use so as to
ensure a farmer, for instance, the appropriate water supply, provided
that he has obtained the required water use license. This mechanism
ensures the farmer that his crops would not be affected by over-consumption
nor by unexpected pollution from up stream users. This trusting
environment is an effective incentive for farmers to carry out activities
that require bigger investments, such as more sophisticated irrigated
crops with higher value added.
The creation of ANA brought up important benefits. Through the establishment
of secure and clear rules and regulations it contributes to the
creation and consolidation of a trusting environment, thus providing
an important incentive to attract economic investments which must
rely on significant water inputs.
|